Current:Home > reviewsAppeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight -Horizon Finance School
Appeals court declines to reconsider dispute over Trump gag order, teeing up potential Supreme Court fight
View
Date:2025-04-18 21:10:02
Washington — A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., rejected a request by former President Donald Trump to reconsider an order limiting what he can say about his criminal case related to the aftermath of the 2020 election, setting up a potential Supreme Court fight over the matter.
In a short unsigned order issued Tuesday, the judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit denied Trump's request that they take up the dispute over the gag order "en banc," meaning in front of the full court. A three-judge panel largely upheld the gag order in December, allowing Trump to request a review by the full appeals court.
U.S. District Judge Tanya Chutkan, who is overseeing the case brought by special counsel Jack Smith against Trump in Washington, issued an order in October at the request of Smith that barred Trump from making inflammatory remarks targeting Smith, his staff, court personnel and possible witnesses who may be called to testify in the case.
The three-judge panel upheld most of Chutkan's order, ruling that Trump cannot target potential witnesses or speak publicly about any lawyers involved in the case — except Smith himself — or their families. However, Trump can continue criticizing the Biden administration and the Justice Department, and can claim that Smith's prosecution is politically motivated.
Tuesday's order denying Trump's appeal indicated the decision was unanimous, with no judges requesting a vote on the matter. Trump's attorneys had previously indicated that they would likely take the matter to the Supreme Court if the appeals court did not rule in their favor.
CBS News has reached out to Trump's campaign for comment.
In the December order, the three judges — Patricia Millett, Cornelia Pillard and Bradley Garcia — said they agreed with Chutkan that some aspects of Trump's public comments "pose a significant and imminent threat" to the integrity of the ongoing criminal prosecution, "warranting a speech-constraining protective order."
But the judges also said the order put in place by Chutkan "sweeps in more protected speech than is necessary" and struck down portions of the restrictions, including those that prevented Trump from publicly speaking about Smith.
Trump was charged with four counts related to alleged efforts to prevent the transfer of presidential power after the 2020 election. He has pleaded not guilty and denied all wrongdoing.
The former president's legal team argued that any gag order infringed on Trump's right to free speech, especially on the campaign trail, and linked his outspoken criticism about the special counsel's criminal case to his bid to return to the White House. Smith's team, however, contended that some of Trump's public comments and social media posts jeopardized a fair trial and the security of those involved.
The trial was originally scheduled for March, but the case is on hold as the appeals court considers Trump's separate claim of presidential immunity from prosecution. Chutkan rejected that argument last year and ruled that while all trial deadlines are paused, the restrictions of the gag order remain in effect as the appeals process plays out.
Robert LegareRobert Legare is a CBS News multiplatform reporter and producer covering the Justice Department, federal courts and investigations. He was previously an associate producer for the "CBS Evening News with Norah O'Donnell."
veryGood! (83)
Related
- Off the Grid: Sally breaks down USA TODAY's daily crossword puzzle, Triathlon
- Las Vegas mayor says the A's should 'figure out a way to stay in Oakland'
- Man sailing from California arrives in Hawaii after Coast Guard launched search for him
- Jury selection starts for father accused of killing 5-year-old Harmony Montgomery
- FACT FOCUS: Inspector general’s Jan. 6 report misrepresented as proof of FBI setup
- Senate deal on border security and Ukraine aid faces defeat as Republicans are ready to block bill
- Honda recalls more than 750,000 vehicles for airbag issue: Here's what models are affected
- Which states could have abortion on the ballot in 2024?
- Opinion: Gianni Infantino, FIFA sell souls and 2034 World Cup for Saudi Arabia's billions
- Wisconsin justice included horses in ads as vulgar joke about opponent, campaign manager says
Ranking
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- EPA tightens rules on some air pollution for the first time in over a decade
- Crew Member Dies Following Accident on Marvel's Wonder Man Set
- A booming bourbon industry has Kentucky leaders toasting record growth
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Cough? Sore throat? More schools suggest mildly sick kids attend anyway
- Why AP called the Nevada Democratic primary for Joe Biden
- Georgia Senate passes bill to revive oversight panel that critics say is aimed at Trump prosecution
Recommendation
Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
Brandon Aiyuk is finally catching attention as vital piece of 49ers' Super Bowl run
Pennsylvania man charged with flying drone over Baltimore stadium during AFC championship game
16-year-old suspect in Juneteenth shooting that hurt 6 sent to adult court
Dick Vitale announces he is cancer free: 'Santa Claus came early'
FAA tells Congress not to raise the mandatory retirement for pilots until it can study the issue
'Put the dog back': Georgia family accuses Amazon driver of trying to steal puppy from yard
Edmonton Oilers' win streak ends at 16 games after loss to Vegas Golden Knights